via Zerohedge: Thorium's Potential As An Energy Source

Kirk Sorensen: A Detailed Exploration Of Thorium's Potential As An Energy Source
Kirk Sorensen, NASA-trained engineer, is a man on a mission to open minds to the tremendous promise that thorium, a near-valueless element in today's marketplace, may offer in meeting future world energy demand.
Compared to Uranium-238-based nuclear reactors currently in use today, a liquid flouride thorium reactor (LTFR) would be:

• Much safer - no risk of environmental radiation contamination or plant explosion (e.g. Chernobyl, Fukushima, Three-Mile Island)
• Much more efficient at producing energy - over 90% of the input fuel would be tapped for energy; vs <1 in="in" li="li" reactors="reactors" s="s" today="today">
• Less waste-generating - most of the radioactive by-products would take days/weeks to degrade to safe levels, vs centuries
• Much cheaper - reactor footprints and infrastructure would be much smaller, and could be constructed in modular fashion
• More plentiful - LFTR reactors do not need to be located next to large water supplies, as current plants do
• Less controversial - the byproducts of the thorium reaction are pretty useless for weaponization
• Longer-lived - thorium is much more plentiful than uranium and treated as valueless today. There is virtually no danger of running out of it given LFTR plant efficiency 

Most of the know-how and technology to build and maintain LFTR reactors exists today. If made a priority, the US could have its first fully-operational LFTR plant running at commercial scale in under a decade.

The article continues with graphics and a video at Zerohedge

I encourage everyone to read this. Seems a no-brainer to me. (A judgement some say I am uniquely qualified to make.)