So, what’s unusual about the current yield curve?
- The slope of six months to three months (19 bp) is very inverted — a first percentile phenomenon.
- The slope of two years to three months (38 bp) is very inverted — a third percentile phenomenon.
- The slope of seven years to ten years is steep (57 bp - 5 bp away from the record wide) — a 100th percentile phenomenon.
- The slope of five years to thirty years is steep (186 bp - 30 bp away from the record wide) — a 100th percentile phenomenon.
- The slope of two years to thirty years is steep (274 bp - 97 bp away from the record wide) — a 97th percentile phenomenon.
- The slope of ten years to thirty years is steep (82 bp - 29 bp away from the record wide) — a 98th percentile phenomenon.
- The butterfly of three months to two years to thirty years is at the record wide (312 bp). (Sum of #5 and #2. Buy 3 months and 30-years, and double sell 2-years? Lots of positive carry, but the 30-year yield could steepen further versus the rest of the curve, and its price volatility is much higher than the shorter bonds.)
What prior yield curves is the current yield curve shaped like?
- 9/7/1993 — after the end of the 1990-1992 easing cycle to rescue the banks from their commercial real estate loans.
- 2/15/1996 — after the end of a minor easing cycle, recovering from the 1994 “annus horribilis” for bonds.
- 9/14/2001 — 60% through the massive easing cycle where Greenspan overshot Fed policy in an effort to reliquefy the economy, particularly industrial companies that were in trouble. Also days after 9/11, when the Fed promised whatever liquidity the market might need to stave off the crisis.
Okay, I’ve set the stage. What conclusions might we draw from the current shape of the yield curve?
Go to Aleph to read his conclusions. (I am only willing to pirate so much of his work)
No comments:
Post a Comment